• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

V12 Testing Thread

Code: 
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299104 > Error getting work from dashd:
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299194 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299249 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 577, in _runCallbacks
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299303 >     current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299354 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1155, in gotResult
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299403 >     _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299450 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1097, in _inlineCallbacks
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299499 >     result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299548 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 389, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299597 >     return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299638 > --- <exception caught here> ---
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299679 >   File "/home/test/p2pool-dash/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 41, in f
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299719 >     result = yield func(*args, **kwargs)
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299766 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1097, in _inlineCallbacks
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299814 >     result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299861 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 389, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299910 >     return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
2015-06-18 15:57:46.299957 >   File "/home/test/p2pool-dash/p2pool/dash/helper.py", line 36, in getwork
2015-06-18 15:57:46.300004 >     work = yield go()
2015-06-18 15:57:46.300051 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1097, in _inlineCallbacks
2015-06-18 15:57:46.300096 >     result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
2015-06-18 15:57:46.300142 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 389, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
2015-06-18 15:57:46.300204 >     return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
2015-06-18 15:57:46.300253 >   File "/home/test/p2pool-dash/p2pool/util/jsonrpc.py", line 143, in _http_do
2015-06-18 15:57:46.300299 >     raise Error_for_code(resp['error']['code'])(resp['error']['message'], resp['error'].get('data', None))
2015-06-18 15:57:46.300347 > p2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -1 CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed
 
In windows 7, 64 bit

2015-06-18 13:07:37 ERROR: ContextualCheckBlockHeader : rejected nVersion=2 block
2015-06-18 13:07:37 ERROR: invalid header received
2015-06-18 13:07:37 ProcessMessage(headers, 162003 bytes) FAILED peer=547
...
2015-06-18 13:08:13 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader : prev block not found
2015-06-18 13:08:13 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock : AcceptBlock FAILED
2015-06-18 13:08:13 Misbehaving: 213.239.202.92:51390 (30 -> 40)
2015-06-18 13:08:16 ERROR: ContextualCheckBlockHeader : rejected nVersion=2 block
2015-06-18 13:08:16 ERROR: invalid header received
 
thelazier said:
Try my p2pool ? test.p2pool.dash.siampm.com:17903 or 103.13.228.168:17903
:D
Click to expand...

Seems to be working fine

Code: 
[2015-06-18 14:54:41] accepted: 72/73 (98.63%), 392.25 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-06-18 14:54:41] accepted: 73/74 (98.65%), 392.25 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-06-18 14:54:42] thread 5: 1138519 hashes, 51.73 khash/s
[2015-06-18 14:54:43] accepted: 74/75 (98.67%), 393.43 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-06-18 14:54:44] thread 6: 1182315 hashes, 50.95 khash/s
[2015-06-18 14:54:44] accepted: 75/76 (98.68%), 395.54 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-06-18 14:54:45] thread 4: 190904 hashes, 49.00 khash/s
[2015-06-18 14:54:45] accepted: 76/77 (98.70%), 394.55 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-06-18 14:54:46] thread 0: 660458 hashes, 52.61 khash/s
[2015-06-18 14:54:46] accepted: 77/78 (98.72%), 398.37 khash/s (yay!!!)

Found any block yet?
 
BrainShutdown said:
Seems to be working fine

Code: 
[2015-06-18 14:54:41] accepted: 72/73 (98.63%), 392.25 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-06-18 14:54:41] accepted: 73/74 (98.65%), 392.25 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-06-18 14:54:42] thread 5: 1138519 hashes, 51.73 khash/s
[2015-06-18 14:54:43] accepted: 74/75 (98.67%), 393.43 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-06-18 14:54:44] thread 6: 1182315 hashes, 50.95 khash/s
[2015-06-18 14:54:44] accepted: 75/76 (98.68%), 395.54 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-06-18 14:54:45] thread 4: 190904 hashes, 49.00 khash/s
[2015-06-18 14:54:45] accepted: 76/77 (98.70%), 394.55 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-06-18 14:54:46] thread 0: 660458 hashes, 52.61 khash/s
[2015-06-18 14:54:46] accepted: 77/78 (98.72%), 398.37 khash/s (yay!!!)

Found any block yet?
Click to expand...
http://test.insight.dash.siampm.com
:D
http://test.explorer.dashninja.pl/b...a7e819812d88debc818a3ecec7907b45cb4178dd600be
 
Nice... Both of my wallets seem to be synced to the right chain...
Both got the first "DS Collateral Payment" and the first round of mixing ..

Hopefully the forks on testnet are over and we're moving on to testing more cool stuff.
 
Hm... Now I'm getting this again:
"Last Darksend message: No compatible Masternode found."

Edit1: And "Masternode: already have that input"
It seems we've got new DS messages.
What do all these mean?

Edit2: One of my wallet sees 91 MNs. the other sees 77.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just saw a DS message with no message:

upload_2015-6-18_11-28-34.png
 
UdjinM6 said:
dashd = daemon i.e. the main program (and you can run it in background)
dash-cli = console i.e. the pogram to control daemon (to ask it smth) through rpc when it's already running (and that also means you can have it anywhere, there is no need to copy it to some specific folder)
dash-qt = GUI wallet (GUI + main program)

That date is "static" and used to get deterministic (reproducible) builds every bit of which match no matter who build it if he doesn't modified the source. That way you can build binaries yourself and prove that binaries from official site were build from actual code in repo for example.



Yep, there is a buffer overflow issue, should be fixed in next binaries https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/360

EDIT: Oh, you already found it on bitcoin site, I should reload page before posting :smile:
Click to expand...

TanteStefana said:
Ok, gonna come back in a bit when you're all ready, I'll try to write something up on how to use the "new" set up so it's not confusing to others.

UdjinM6, you say we can put the dash-cli program anywhere, but we have to access it via command line from within the folder it resides in, no? Please let me know if that is correct. Thanks!

Also, what are the test versions for? Do we use those instead while testing? Or??? Don't understand their presence. Thanks again! :)
Click to expand...

coingun said:
It isn't really taht confusing. You basically only use dashd to start the daemon. All your other interaction is just now done with dash-cli.

So before it was dashd getinfo now it's dash-cli getinfo all of the "interaction" with the daemon is simply done with a different program. This makes it more robust so that teh daemon runs individually from the rest of the code querying it.
Click to expand...

If you guys want I can screen capture myself starting the dashd and then issuing a few commands using the dash-cli. I can move the dash-cli around on my local machine (different locations) to show that you can access it from anywhere. Let me know if this would be usefull and Ill throw together a quick little video.
 
moli said:
The mixing seems very sluggish. One of my wallet shows block height: "blocks" : 69620, the other shows "blocks" : 69618,
The explorers also start to be at different block heights.

These are the explorers I'm checking:

http://test.insight.dash.siampm.com/
http://test.explorer.dashninja.pl/chain/Dash
http://blockchains.io/drkt/blocks/
Click to expand...

There could be a fork I am on block = 69618 and spork show has this to say,

"Unknown" : 1220131694,
"SPORK_3_INSTANTX_BLOCK_FILTERING" : 1220131694,
"Unknown" : 1523519981

Confirmed, I was on the wrong fork(split at block 69511) , attempting to hop onto the long chain ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One of my wallets has a lot of "Found unconfirmed denominated outputs" messages.
....
2015-06-18 16:15:25 Last Darksend message: Darksend is idle.
2015-06-18 16:15:27 CDarksendPool::UpdateState() == 1 | 3
2015-06-18 16:15:27 DoAutomaticDenominating -- Found unconfirmed denominated outputs, will wait till they confirm to continue.
2015-06-18 16:15:27 Last Darksend message: Found unconfirmed denominated outputs, will wait till they confirm to continue.
Click to expand...
 
Now one of the wallets got a stuck "DS Denominate" fee and both wallets aren't moving...
Going to zap and reindex...
 
moli said:
Now one of the wallets got a stuck "DS Denominate" fee and both wallets aren't moving...
Going to zap and reindex...
Click to expand...

I deleted everything, it seems to have worked, am on 69668 with mining coming in from http://test.p2pool.dash.siampm.com/static/p2pool-ui-punchy/
The spork is still showing at
2015-06-18 16:51:53 spork - new e7c34a21d2f35f55bb1764c075e7d51ef04a4d743566c0bcab17b96454cf0465 ID 10000 Time 1220131694 bestHeight 69665

Hit me at this address for checking
xxCEp8HnKeM3xqB3weo9m5xUJjvw6Tmv6q
 
Sub-Ether said:
I deleted everything, it seems to have worked, am on 69668 with mining coming in from http://test.p2pool.dash.siampm.com/static/p2pool-ui-punchy/
The spork is still showing at
2015-06-18 16:51:53 spork - new e7c34a21d2f35f55bb1764c075e7d51ef04a4d743566c0bcab17b96454cf0465 ID 10000 Time 1220131694 bestHeight 69665

Hit me at this address for checking
xxCEp8HnKeM3xqB3weo9m5xUJjvw6Tmv6q
Click to expand...
Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx), broadcast through 24 node(s)
Date: 6/18/2015 13:08
To: xxCEp8HnKeM3xqB3weo9m5xUJjvw6Tmv6q
Debit: -100.00000000 tDASH
Transaction fee: -0.01000000 tDASH
Net amount: -100.01000000 tDASH
Transaction ID: 13b46e83bbf7131a7a4e187f3e68432c899c2777b1fd3a1b5e767ee1554

EDIT:
Status: 6 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 24 node(s)
Date: 6/18/2015 13:08
To: xxCEp8HnKeM3xqB3weo9m5xUJjvw6Tmv6q
Debit: -100.00000000 tDASH
Transaction fee: -0.01000000 tDASH
Net amount: -100.01000000 tDASH
Transaction ID: 13b46e83bbf7131a7a4e187f3e68432c899c2777b1fd3a1b5e767ee1554f71cc-000


Got my wallet reindexed and zapped (just right before I Instantxed you that tx.. so slick for now) :)
"version" : 120001,
"protocolversion" : 70077,
"walletversion" : 61000,
"balance" : 2284.22642503,
"darksend_balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 69675,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
moli said:
Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx), broadcast through 24 node(s)


EDIT:
Status: 6 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 24 node(s)
Date: 6/18/2015 13:08
To: xxCEp8HnKeM3xqB3weo9m5xUJjvw6Tmv6q
Debit: -100.00000000 tDASH
Transaction fee: -0.01000000 tDASH
Net amount: -100.01000000 tDASH
Transaction ID: 13b46e83bbf7131a7a4e187f3e68432c899c2777b1fd3a1b5e767ee1554f71cc-000

,
Click to expand...

Well I got it, thats the good news but ..

Status: 1/confirmed (InstantX verification failed) Date: 18/06/2015 18:08 From: unknownTo: xxCEp8HnKeM3xqB3weo9m5xUJjvw6Tmv6q (own address) Credit: 100.00000000 tDASHNet amount: +100.00000000 tDASH

Edit: 2nd transaction worked :cool:
Status: 5/confirmed (verified via instantx)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top